Cypriot vs Chinese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Cypriot
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Cypriots

Chinese

Excellent
Exceptional
8,674
SOCIAL INDEX
84.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
58th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chinese Integration in Cypriot Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 27,844,862 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Cypriot communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cypriots within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.081% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cypriots corresponds to an increase of 80.7 Chinese.
Cypriot Integration in Chinese Communities

Cypriot vs Chinese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cypriot and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,899 compared to $46,098, a difference of 19.1%), median male earnings ($65,549 compared to $56,872, a difference of 15.3%), and median earnings ($54,589 compared to $48,836, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($102,843 compared to $98,496, a difference of 4.4%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($123,396 compared to $116,156, a difference of 6.2%).
Cypriot vs Chinese Income
Income MetricCypriotChinese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$54,899
Exceptional
$46,098
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$127,064
Exceptional
$116,188
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$102,843
Exceptional
$98,496
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,589
Exceptional
$48,836
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$65,549
Exceptional
$56,872
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$45,570
Exceptional
$41,461
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Average
$52,209
Exceptional
$58,162
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$116,364
Exceptional
$104,264
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$123,396
Exceptional
$116,156
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,714
Exceptional
$77,465
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Average
25.9%

Cypriot vs Chinese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cypriot and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 32.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.2% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 22.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 3.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and single male poverty (11.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 6.4%).
Cypriot vs Chinese Poverty
Poverty MetricCypriotChinese
Poverty
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
9.5%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
6.5%
Males
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
8.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.3%
Exceptional
16.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.0%
Exceptional
13.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Exceptional
11.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Exceptional
11.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.0%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.2%
Exceptional
16.1%
Single Fathers
Excellent
15.9%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.3%
Exceptional
24.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Exceptional
3.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
8.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
9.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.9%
Exceptional
9.8%

Cypriot vs Chinese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cypriot and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 34.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 29.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 28.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.68%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.71%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.6%).
Cypriot vs Chinese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCypriotChinese
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.5%
Youth < 25
Fair
11.7%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.6%
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.4%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%

Cypriot vs Chinese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cypriot and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 14.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.59%).
Cypriot vs Chinese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCypriotChinese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.8%
Exceptional
38.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.3%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.8%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.1%
Exceptional
84.1%

Cypriot vs Chinese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cypriot and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.0% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 11.9%), family households (63.2% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 7.8%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (25.9% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 0.42%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and currently married (47.8% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 3.6%).
Cypriot vs Chinese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCypriotChinese
Family Households
Tragic
63.2%
Exceptional
68.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
25.9%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.0%
Exceptional
50.4%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.8%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.0%
Excellent
30.2%

Cypriot vs Chinese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cypriot and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 90.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 76.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 43.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 8.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.6% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 18.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 43.6%).
Cypriot vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCypriotChinese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.4%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.6%
Exceptional
60.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
16.6%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
8.8%

Cypriot vs Chinese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cypriot and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 55.5%), master's degree (21.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 49.5%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 45.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.9% compared to 89.0%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.29%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.29%).
Cypriot vs Chinese Education Level
Education Level MetricCypriotChinese
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Exceptional
94.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.1%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.5%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.9%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
72.0%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
67.0%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
56.4%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
49.0%
Good
38.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
21.8%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.9%
Average
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Fair
1.8%

Cypriot vs Chinese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cypriot and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 30.7%), male disability (10.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 20.5%), and ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 4.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 7.1%).
Cypriot vs Chinese Disability
Disability MetricCypriotChinese
Disability
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.1%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
43.5%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.1%
Exceptional
15.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%