Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Chinese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Chinese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Uzbekistan

Chinese

Fair
Exceptional
4,141
SOCIAL INDEX
38.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
204th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Chinese Integration in Immigrants from Uzbekistan Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 41,061,940 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Uzbekistan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.238. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uzbekistan within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.042% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uzbekistan corresponds to a decrease of 42.4 Chinese.
Immigrants from Uzbekistan Integration in Chinese Communities

Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Chinese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,331 compared to $77,465, a difference of 37.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,523 compared to $116,156, a difference of 15.5%), and median household income ($86,425 compared to $98,496, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($46,929 compared to $46,098, a difference of 1.8%), median male earnings ($57,941 compared to $56,872, a difference of 1.9%), and median earnings ($50,151 compared to $48,836, a difference of 2.7%).
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Chinese Income
Income MetricImmigrants from UzbekistanChinese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,929
Exceptional
$46,098
Median Family Income
Average
$103,197
Exceptional
$116,188
Median Household Income
Good
$86,425
Exceptional
$98,496
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,151
Exceptional
$48,836
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,941
Exceptional
$56,872
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,363
Exceptional
$41,461
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,846
Exceptional
$58,162
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$98,849
Exceptional
$104,264
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Average
$100,523
Exceptional
$116,156
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,331
Exceptional
$77,465
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.7%
Average
25.9%

Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Chinese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 82.5%), married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 82.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 68.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.0% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 2.6%), single male poverty (11.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 17.9%).
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Chinese Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from UzbekistanChinese
Poverty
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
9.5%
Families
Tragic
10.0%
Exceptional
6.5%
Males
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
8.7%
Females
Tragic
14.4%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.2%
Exceptional
16.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
12.9%
Exceptional
11.0%
Children Under 5 years
Good
17.0%
Exceptional
13.1%
Children Under 16 years
Poor
17.1%
Exceptional
11.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Poor
17.3%
Exceptional
11.9%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
17.1%
Exceptional
12.3%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.0%
Single Females
Excellent
20.3%
Exceptional
16.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
15.4%
Single Mothers
Average
29.3%
Exceptional
24.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
3.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.0%
Exceptional
8.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.5%
Exceptional
9.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.3%
Exceptional
9.8%

Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Chinese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 27.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 27.4%), and female unemployment (5.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 7.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.7%).
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Chinese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from UzbekistanChinese
Unemployment
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Males
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.5%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.5%
Exceptional
16.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
5.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
4.9%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
5.5%
Exceptional
4.4%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
6.8%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%

Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Chinese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.2% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 32.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.4% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 9.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.3% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 0.48%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.54%).
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Chinese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from UzbekistanChinese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.3%
Tragic
64.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.1%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
29.2%
Exceptional
38.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
70.4%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.9%
Poor
84.3%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Exceptional
84.1%

Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Chinese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.8% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 17.3%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.4%), and married-couple households (45.4% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.88%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.1%).
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Chinese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from UzbekistanChinese
Family Households
Tragic
63.4%
Exceptional
68.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
26.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.4%
Exceptional
50.4%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Exceptional
3.34
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Currently Married
Good
46.9%
Exceptional
49.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
25.8%
Excellent
30.2%

Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Chinese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (26.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 224.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 144.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 99.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (73.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 25.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (37.9% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 58.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 99.2%).
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from UzbekistanChinese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
26.7%
Exceptional
8.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
73.4%
Exceptional
91.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
37.9%
Exceptional
60.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
23.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
3.6%
Exceptional
8.8%

Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Chinese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 75.4%), master's degree (17.9% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 22.6%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%).
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Chinese Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from UzbekistanChinese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
1.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.4%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.1%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Exceptional
97.1%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
96.9%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
96.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Exceptional
95.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.5%
Exceptional
94.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.1%
Exceptional
93.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Exceptional
92.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.6%
Exceptional
89.0%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.8%
Exceptional
68.3%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
61.0%
Exceptional
62.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.3%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.8%
Good
38.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.9%
Fair
14.6%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Average
4.5%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
2.0%
Fair
1.8%

Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Chinese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uzbekistan and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 36.0%), disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 34.3%), and male disability (10.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.56%), ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.74%), and disability age over 75 (49.2% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 0.93%).
Immigrants from Uzbekistan vs Chinese Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from UzbekistanChinese
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
12.1%
Females
Fair
12.3%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.85%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.5%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
10.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.8%
Exceptional
21.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.2%
Tragic
48.7%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
3.7%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
15.9%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
6.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.9%
Tragic
2.6%