Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Northern Africa
Chinese
7,346
SOCIAL INDEX
70.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
121st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Immigrants from Northern Africa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,001,190 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Northern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.490. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Northern Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.039% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Northern Africa corresponds to an increase of 38.7 Chinese.
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,522 compared to $77,465, a difference of 23.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,430 compared to $116,156, a difference of 10.2%), and median household income ($90,026 compared to $98,496, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($46,531 compared to $46,098, a difference of 0.94%), median female earnings ($42,084 compared to $41,461, a difference of 1.5%), and median earnings ($49,648 compared to $48,836, a difference of 1.7%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,531 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,161 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,026 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $49,648 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $58,008 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,084 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,185 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,232 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $105,430 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Excellent $62,522 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.2% | Average 25.9% |
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 42.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 37.4%), and family poverty (8.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.35%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.8%), and receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 12.5%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Chinese |
Poverty | Good 12.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Good 8.8% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Average 11.1% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Good 13.2% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Excellent 19.7% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.6% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.4% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Good 15.8% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Good 16.0% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Good 16.0% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.0% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.3% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.0% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Average 5.2% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Average 11.0% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.5% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.0% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 38.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 24.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.80%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 5.6%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Chinese |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Good 17.4% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Poor 5.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Excellent 7.4% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Average 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 7.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.48%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.6% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.3% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.9% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.6% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.2% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.2% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.3% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.7%), married-couple households (46.0% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 9.6%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 2.5%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Chinese |
Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.0% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.22 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.5% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.5% | Excellent 30.2% |
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 56.7%), no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 53.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 14.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 34.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 12.6% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 87.4% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.3% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 48.7%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 20.0%), and master's degree (17.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (61.9% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.55%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.75%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.76%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Poor 97.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Poor 97.6% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Poor 97.4% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.8% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.5% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.7% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Average 93.7% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Average 92.6% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.4% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.4% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.3% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.2% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 61.9% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.7% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.9% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.1% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.1% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Fair 1.8% |
Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 33.6%), male disability (10.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 15.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.13%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 2.0%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Northern Africa | Chinese |
Disability | Exceptional 10.9% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.4% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.7% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |