Immigrants from Bolivia vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,873,342 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Immigrant from Bolivia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.078. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bolivia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bolivia corresponds to an increase of 6.6 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bolivia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,970 compared to $46,098, a difference of 6.2%), median earnings ($51,605 compared to $48,836, a difference of 5.7%), and median male earnings ($60,088 compared to $56,872, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 0.38%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,731 compared to $116,156, a difference of 1.4%), and median family income ($117,912 compared to $116,188, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bolivia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 29.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 28.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bolivia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 44.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 20.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bolivia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (68.4% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (86.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (85.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bolivia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 16.0%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 14.0%), and family households with children (29.3% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.59%), average family size (3.31 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.96%), and family households (66.6% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bolivia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 31.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 17.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.75%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bolivia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 71.7%), master's degree (19.1% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 31.2%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (67.9% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 0.59%), college, 1 year or more (62.8% compared to 62.2%, a difference of 0.98%), and nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bolivia and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 44.4%), ambulatory disability (5.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 28.7%), and male disability (9.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 4.1%).