Bangladeshi vs Chinese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,591,354 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Bangladeshi communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.474. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Bangladeshis within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Bangladeshis corresponds to an increase of 4.6 Chinese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($54,719 compared to $77,465, a difference of 41.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,402 compared to $116,156, a difference of 34.4%), and median household income ($74,112 compared to $98,496, a difference of 32.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,960 compared to $41,461, a difference of 15.3%), wage/income gap (22.2% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 16.9%), and median earnings ($41,263 compared to $48,836, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (20.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 68.8%), family poverty (10.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 67.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 66.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.4%), single male poverty (13.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 21.5%), and single mother poverty (31.7% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 28.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 62.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 25.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 10.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.78%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 0.86%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 57.7%), single father households (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 55.7%), and family households with children (30.1% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.37 compared to 3.34, a difference of 0.83%), family households (64.3% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 17.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 9.2%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 0.52%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 140.4%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 45.7%), and professional degree (3.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (96.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Bangladeshi and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 32.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.8% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.28%), disability age over 75 (49.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability (12.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.9%).