Brazilian vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Brazilian
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Brazilians
Chinese
6,919
SOCIAL INDEX
66.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
136th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Brazilian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,520,366 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.545. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.069% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to an increase of 69.0 Chinese.
Brazilian vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,465 compared to $77,465, a difference of 26.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,408 compared to $116,156, a difference of 11.3%), and median household income ($88,934 compared to $98,496, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($56,837 compared to $56,872, a difference of 0.060%), median earnings ($48,356 compared to $48,836, a difference of 0.99%), and per capita income ($46,700 compared to $46,098, a difference of 1.3%).
Income Metric | Brazilian | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,700 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $106,942 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $88,934 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,356 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,837 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,483 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,335 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $98,267 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $104,408 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Good $61,465 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 26.7% | Average 25.9% |
Brazilian vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 41.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 37.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 0.38%), single male poverty (11.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 13.4%).
Poverty Metric | Brazilian | Chinese |
Poverty | Good 11.9% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Excellent 8.6% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Excellent 10.8% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Excellent 13.0% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.6% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Excellent 13.1% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.4% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.4% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.8% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.4% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.1% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.5% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.3% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Good 5.0% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Poor 11.3% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.1% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Brazilian vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 56.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 29.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.9%), male unemployment (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 6.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Brazilian | Chinese |
Unemployment | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.1% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Fair 4.6% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 5.0% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.7% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.1% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Brazilian vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.44%).
Labor Participation Metric | Brazilian | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.6% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.5% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.8% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.3% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.4% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.7% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Brazilian vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.0%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.0%), and married-couple households (46.2% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 0.47%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.34, a difference of 4.9%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 6.3%).
Family Structure Metric | Brazilian | Chinese |
Family Households | Poor 63.9% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.7% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.2% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.18 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Average 6.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.4% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Average 12.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.4% | Excellent 30.2% |
Brazilian vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 64.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 37.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 11.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 26.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Brazilian | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Average 10.4% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.0% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.8% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.4% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Brazilian vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 40.0%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 17.7%), and master's degree (16.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (48.7% compared to 48.5%, a difference of 0.31%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.58%).
Education Level Metric | Brazilian | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.1% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Fair 97.2% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Fair 96.9% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Fair 96.0% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Average 94.9% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Good 93.8% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Good 92.8% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.3% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 65.9% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Good 60.5% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 48.7% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.8% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.5% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.0% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.1% | Fair 1.8% |
Brazilian vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 27.7%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 26.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.62%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 3.0%).
Disability Metric | Brazilian | Chinese |
Disability | Exceptional 11.4% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Excellent 10.9% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.4% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Good 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Good 2.9% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Good 17.1% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |