Egyptian vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Egyptian
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Egyptians
Chinese
8,596
SOCIAL INDEX
83.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
61st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Egyptian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,231,181 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Egyptian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Egyptians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.050% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Egyptians corresponds to an increase of 49.8 Chinese.
Egyptian vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,441 compared to $77,465, a difference of 18.4%), median male earnings ($61,095 compared to $56,872, a difference of 7.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,444 compared to $58,162, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,282 compared to $104,264, a difference of 0.98%), median family income ($114,119 compared to $116,188, a difference of 1.8%), and wage/income gap (26.6% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 2.6%).
Income Metric | Egyptian | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $48,358 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $114,119 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $95,673 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,701 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,095 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,305 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,444 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $105,282 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $112,256 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,441 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.6% | Average 25.9% |
Egyptian vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 33.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 32.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 25.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 2.8%), single male poverty (11.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and single father poverty (14.7% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 5.1%).
Poverty Metric | Egyptian | Chinese |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.3% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 18.5% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.1% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.7% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 26.9% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.8% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.5% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Average 12.1% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Egyptian vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 37.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 25.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.5%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Egyptian | Chinese |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Fair 11.7% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.5% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.4% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.1% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.1% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Egyptian vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.63%).
Labor Participation Metric | Egyptian | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.2% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.2% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.5% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 73.7% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.1% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.8% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.5% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Egyptian vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 14.6%), family households with children (28.6% compared to 26.0%, a difference of 9.9%), and births to unmarried women (28.2% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.95%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.34, a difference of 3.3%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 3.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Egyptian | Chinese |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.4% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.6% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.2% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.2% | Excellent 30.2% |
Egyptian vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 44.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 44.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.2% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 10.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 25.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Egyptian | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 11.9% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.2% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.3% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Poor 19.0% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Fair 6.1% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Egyptian vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 40.2%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 24.0%), and master's degree (17.6% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 68.3%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.62%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.63%).
Education Level Metric | Egyptian | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.7% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Average 97.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Average 96.1% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Average 95.8% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Good 95.0% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Good 94.0% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Excellent 93.0% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 91.9% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 89.9% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.1% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.3% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 63.1% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.9% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 43.3% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.6% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Fair 1.8% |
Egyptian vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Egyptian and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 35.3%), male disability (10.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 19.6%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 0.66%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 4.7%).
Disability Metric | Egyptian | Chinese |
Disability | Exceptional 10.6% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.1% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.1% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.6% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.1% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |