Sierra Leonean vs Chinese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Sierra Leonean
Chinese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Sierra Leoneans
Chinese
4,851
SOCIAL INDEX
46.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
191st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,296
SOCIAL INDEX
90.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
23rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Chinese Integration in Sierra Leonean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 33,008,765 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese within Sierra Leonean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.005. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sierra Leoneans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Chinese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sierra Leoneans corresponds to an increase of 0.3 Chinese.
Sierra Leonean vs Chinese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.4% compared to 25.9%, a difference of 20.8%), householder income over 65 years ($65,038 compared to $77,465, a difference of 19.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,427 compared to $116,156, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($48,286 compared to $48,836, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($57,272 compared to $58,162, a difference of 1.5%), and median female earnings ($42,868 compared to $41,461, a difference of 3.4%).
Income Metric | Sierra Leonean | Chinese |
Per Capita Income | Average $43,405 | Exceptional $46,098 |
Median Family Income | Good $103,859 | Exceptional $116,188 |
Median Household Income | Excellent $88,463 | Exceptional $98,496 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,286 | Exceptional $48,836 |
Median Male Earnings | Average $54,279 | Exceptional $56,872 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,868 | Exceptional $41,461 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $57,272 | Exceptional $58,162 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Fair $93,435 | Exceptional $104,264 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $102,427 | Exceptional $116,156 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,038 | Exceptional $77,465 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.4% | Average 25.9% |
Sierra Leonean vs Chinese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (17.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 49.6%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 47.3%), and family poverty (9.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 46.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 24.6%, a difference of 11.4%), single father poverty (17.2% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 11.5%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 15.0%).
Poverty Metric | Sierra Leonean | Chinese |
Poverty | Fair 12.6% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Families | Poor 9.5% | Exceptional 6.5% |
Males | Fair 11.4% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Females | Fair 13.7% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.0% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Fair 17.7% | Exceptional 13.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.8% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 17.6% | Exceptional 12.3% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.7% | Exceptional 16.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.2% | Exceptional 15.4% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.4% | Exceptional 24.6% |
Married Couples | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 3.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.5% | Exceptional 8.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 9.1% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Fair 12.2% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Sierra Leonean vs Chinese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 55.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 28.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 7.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Sierra Leonean | Chinese |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Males | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 10.7% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 19.7% | Exceptional 16.0% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.5% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.2% | Exceptional 6.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 5.9% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.7% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.9% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Sierra Leonean vs Chinese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (68.9% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.6% compared to 38.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 84.3%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (84.5% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Sierra Leonean | Chinese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 68.9% | Tragic 64.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 81.5% | Exceptional 80.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.6% | Exceptional 38.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.3% | Exceptional 77.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.8% | Poor 84.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.0% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 86.4% | Exceptional 85.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.5% | Exceptional 84.1% |
Sierra Leonean vs Chinese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 49.8%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 24.6%), and married-couple households (42.9% compared to 50.4%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.30 compared to 3.34, a difference of 1.3%), family households (63.9% compared to 68.1%, a difference of 6.7%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.4%).
Family Structure Metric | Sierra Leonean | Chinese |
Family Households | Poor 63.9% | Exceptional 68.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.9% | Tragic 26.0% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.9% | Exceptional 50.4% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.30 | Exceptional 3.34 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.4% | Exceptional 49.5% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.9% | Excellent 30.2% |
Sierra Leonean vs Chinese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 50.4%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 33.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.9% compared to 60.1%, a difference of 13.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 30.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Sierra Leonean | Chinese |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 11.0% | Exceptional 8.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.0% | Exceptional 91.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.9% | Exceptional 60.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.3% | Exceptional 23.9% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Sierra Leonean vs Chinese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 57.0%), master's degree (16.8% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 15.2%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.86%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.86%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.86%).
Education Level Metric | Sierra Leonean | Chinese |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Exceptional 98.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.4% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.1% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 97.9% |
7th Grade | Fair 96.0% | Exceptional 97.1% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Exceptional 96.9% |
9th Grade | Average 94.8% | Exceptional 96.3% |
10th Grade | Average 93.7% | Exceptional 95.5% |
11th Grade | Average 92.6% | Exceptional 94.6% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Average 91.1% | Exceptional 93.6% |
High School Diploma | Average 89.1% | Exceptional 92.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Good 86.0% | Exceptional 89.0% |
College, Under 1 year | Good 66.0% | Exceptional 68.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Good 60.2% | Exceptional 62.2% |
Associate's Degree | Excellent 47.7% | Exceptional 48.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 40.1% | Good 38.5% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.8% | Fair 14.6% |
Professional Degree | Good 4.5% | Average 4.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Excellent 2.0% | Fair 1.8% |
Sierra Leonean vs Chinese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sierra Leonean and Chinese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 47.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.1%), and male disability (10.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.7%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 4.7%).
Disability Metric | Sierra Leonean | Chinese |
Disability | Exceptional 11.0% | Tragic 12.2% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 12.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Fair 12.3% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Poor 6.8% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Excellent 10.8% | Exceptional 10.3% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 23.2% | Exceptional 21.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.4% | Tragic 48.7% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 6.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |