Pima vs Apache Male Poverty
COMPARE
Pima
 Apache
 Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Pima
Apache
20.4%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.7%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
335th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Apache Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,538,248 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.538 and weighted average of 20.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 231,014,108 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Apache and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.462 and weighted average of 17.7%, a difference of 15.3%.
 
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Apache | 
| Minimum | 9.2% | 3.1% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 77.3% | 
| Range | 90.8% | 74.2% | 
| Mean | 29.7% | 30.4% | 
| Median | 23.0% | 25.8% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.5% | 15.6% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.4% | 47.0% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.9% | 31.5% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.0% | 18.8% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.7% | 18.6% | 
Demographics Similar to Pima and Apache by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Yup'ik (20.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Lumbee (20.2%, a difference of 0.78%), Immigrants from Yemen (20.1%, a difference of 1.1%), Hopi (20.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and Yuman (19.5%, a difference of 4.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Apache are Cheyenne (17.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Native/Alaskan (16.9%, a difference of 4.4%), Pueblo (18.5%, a difference of 4.8%), Houma (16.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and Sioux (18.7%, a difference of 5.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty | 
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328  | Tragic 15.8%  | 
| Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #329  | Tragic 16.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330  | Tragic 16.2%  | 
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 16.2%  | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 16.7%  | 
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 16.9%  | 
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 17.6%  | 
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 17.7%  | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 18.5%  | 
| Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 18.7%  | 
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 19.1%  | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339  | Tragic 19.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #340  | Tragic 20.1%  | 
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341  | Tragic 20.2%  | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342  | Tragic 20.4%  | 
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #343  | Tragic 20.4%  | 
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #344  | Tragic 20.8%  | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345  | Tragic 22.0%  | 
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #346  | Tragic 22.3%  | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347  | Tragic 22.9%  |