Pima vs Colville Male Poverty
COMPARE
Pima
Colville
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Pima
Colville
20.4%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
323rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Colville Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,538,248 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Pima and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.538 and weighted average of 20.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,680,986 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Colville and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.031 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 33.6%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pima | Colville |
Minimum | 9.2% | 6.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 41.5% |
Range | 90.8% | 35.2% |
Mean | 29.7% | 20.0% |
Median | 23.0% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.5% | 13.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 37.4% | 24.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.9% | 11.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.0% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.7% | 8.5% |
Demographics Similar to Pima and Colville by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Lumbee (20.2%, a difference of 0.78%), Immigrants from Yemen (20.1%, a difference of 1.1%), Yuman (19.5%, a difference of 4.2%), Crow (19.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and Sioux (18.7%, a difference of 8.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Colville are Menominee (15.3%, a difference of 0.19%), Yakama (15.3%, a difference of 0.37%), Kiowa (15.2%, a difference of 0.39%), Central American Indian (15.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and Paiute (15.8%, a difference of 3.6%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 15.2% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 15.2% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 15.3% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 15.3% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 15.3% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 15.8% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.8% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 16.2% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 16.2% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 16.7% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 16.9% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 17.6% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 17.7% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 18.5% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 18.7% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 19.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 19.5% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 20.1% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 20.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 20.4% |