Yakama vs Native/Alaskan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Yakama
Native/Alaskan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Yakama
Natives/Alaskans
28.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
331st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama vs Native/Alaskan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,831,112 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yakama and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.026 and weighted average of 28.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 503,027,149 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.353 and weighted average of 28.2%, a difference of 0.26%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yakama | Native/Alaskan |
Minimum | 17.1% | 8.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 73.3% |
Range | 82.9% | 65.1% |
Mean | 42.1% | 37.0% |
Median | 38.2% | 36.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.8% | 30.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 52.2% | 42.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 26.4% | 12.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.2% | 10.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.7% | 10.1% |
Demographics Similar to Yakama and Natives/Alaskans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Ute (28.4%, a difference of 0.42%), Hopi (28.0%, a difference of 0.90%), Pueblo (28.6%, a difference of 1.1%), Menominee (27.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and Apache (27.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Hopi (28.0%, a difference of 0.64%), Ute (28.4%, a difference of 0.68%), Menominee (27.8%, a difference of 1.3%), Pueblo (28.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and Apache (27.7%, a difference of 1.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |