Yakama vs Colville Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Yakama
Colville
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Yakama
Colville
28.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
29.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama vs Colville Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,831,112 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yakama and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.026 and weighted average of 28.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 34,604,734 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Colville and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.388 and weighted average of 29.1%, a difference of 2.8%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yakama | Colville |
Minimum | 17.1% | 16.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 73.3% |
Range | 82.9% | 56.6% |
Mean | 42.1% | 34.2% |
Median | 38.2% | 32.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.8% | 23.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 52.2% | 40.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 26.4% | 16.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.2% | 12.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.7% | 12.4% |
Demographics Similar to Yakama and Colville by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Native/Alaskan (28.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Ute (28.4%, a difference of 0.42%), Hopi (28.0%, a difference of 0.90%), Pueblo (28.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and Menominee (27.8%, a difference of 1.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Colville are Immigrants from Yemen (28.9%, a difference of 0.49%), Yuman (29.4%, a difference of 1.3%), Pueblo (28.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Ute (28.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and Native/Alaskan (28.2%, a difference of 3.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 31.7% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 32.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 33.0% |