Yakama vs Apache Single Mother Poverty
COMPARE
Yakama
Apache
Single Mother Poverty
Single Mother Poverty Comparison
Yakama
Apache
36.4%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
327th/ 347
METRIC RANK
36.6%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
329th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama vs Apache Single Mother Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,786,189 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yakama and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.043 and weighted average of 36.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 229,112,849 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Apache and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.020 and weighted average of 36.6%, a difference of 0.53%.

Single Mother Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yakama | Apache |
Minimum | 29.5% | 21.9% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 70.5% | 78.1% |
Mean | 52.7% | 57.9% |
Median | 53.2% | 56.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 31.6% | 40.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 63.2% | 72.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 31.6% | 31.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.4% | 20.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 20.0% | 20.5% |
Demographics Similar to Yakama and Apache by Single Mother Poverty
In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Choctaw (36.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Native/Alaskan (36.6%, a difference of 0.64%), Creek (36.7%, a difference of 0.79%), Dutch West Indian (36.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and Seminole (35.8%, a difference of 1.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Apache are Native/Alaskan (36.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Creek (36.7%, a difference of 0.26%), Choctaw (36.4%, a difference of 0.48%), Dutch West Indian (36.8%, a difference of 0.50%), and Menominee (37.1%, a difference of 1.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Poverty |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 34.7% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 34.8% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 34.8% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 35.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 35.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 35.5% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 35.5% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 35.7% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 35.8% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 36.4% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 36.4% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 36.6% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 36.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 36.7% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 36.8% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 37.1% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 37.2% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 37.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 38.5% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 38.5% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 38.6% |