Yakama vs Ute Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Yakama
Ute
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Yakama
Ute
28.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
28.4%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
333rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama vs Ute Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,831,112 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yakama and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.026 and weighted average of 28.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,519,789 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325 and weighted average of 28.4%, a difference of 0.42%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yakama | Ute |
Minimum | 17.1% | 18.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 82.9% | 82.0% |
Mean | 42.1% | 43.7% |
Median | 38.2% | 37.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.8% | 27.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 52.2% | 43.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 26.4% | 16.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.2% | 23.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.7% | 22.9% |
Demographics Similar to Yakama and Ute by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Native/Alaskan (28.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Hopi (28.0%, a difference of 0.90%), Pueblo (28.6%, a difference of 1.1%), Menominee (27.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and Apache (27.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Native/Alaskan (28.2%, a difference of 0.68%), Pueblo (28.6%, a difference of 0.73%), Hopi (28.0%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Yemen (28.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and Menominee (27.8%, a difference of 2.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 30.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 30.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 30.6% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 31.3% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 31.7% |