Yakama vs Seminole Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Yakama
Seminole
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Yakama
Seminole
28.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
26.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
322nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yakama vs Seminole Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,831,112 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Yakama and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.026 and weighted average of 28.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,983,009 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Seminole and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.107 and weighted average of 26.8%, a difference of 5.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yakama | Seminole |
Minimum | 17.1% | 11.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 82.4% |
Range | 82.9% | 71.2% |
Mean | 42.1% | 32.3% |
Median | 38.2% | 28.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 25.8% | 23.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 52.2% | 39.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 26.4% | 16.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.2% | 14.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.7% | 14.1% |
Demographics Similar to Yakama and Seminole by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Native/Alaskan (28.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Ute (28.4%, a difference of 0.42%), Hopi (28.0%, a difference of 0.90%), Pueblo (28.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and Menominee (27.8%, a difference of 1.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Seminole are Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.52%), Yup'ik (26.6%, a difference of 0.74%), Arapaho (26.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and Choctaw (27.2%, a difference of 1.5%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 26.0% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 28.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 28.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 28.9% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 29.1% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 29.4% |