Immigrants from Taiwan vs Chinese Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Taiwan
Chinese
Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Taiwan
Chinese
9.7%
POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
4th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.5%
POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Taiwan vs Chinese Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 298,124,801 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Taiwan and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.039 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,802,428 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.156 and weighted average of 9.5%, a difference of 1.9%.

Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Taiwan | Chinese |
Minimum | 1.1% | 3.4% |
Maximum | 22.5% | 26.1% |
Range | 21.4% | 22.7% |
Mean | 8.0% | 10.2% |
Median | 8.2% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.8% | 11.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.0% | 5.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.5% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Taiwan and Chinese by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Taiwan are Thai (9.6%, a difference of 1.5%), Immigrants from Ireland (10.1%, a difference of 3.7%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.1%, a difference of 3.8%), Filipino (10.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and Maltese (10.2%, a difference of 4.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Thai (9.6%, a difference of 0.45%), Immigrants from Ireland (10.1%, a difference of 5.6%), Immigrants from India (9.0%, a difference of 5.6%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (10.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and Filipino (10.1%, a difference of 6.0%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 9.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 10.1% |
Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 10.2% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 10.3% |
Bhutanese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 10.6% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 10.6% |