Immigrants from Serbia vs Okinawan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Serbia
Okinawan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Serbia
Okinawans
18.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
41st/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
40th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Serbia vs Okinawan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 130,863,252 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Serbia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.349 and weighted average of 18.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,373,565 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Okinawans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.018 and weighted average of 18.8%, a difference of 0.020%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Serbia | Okinawan |
Minimum | 2.5% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 41.7% | 39.6% |
Range | 39.1% | 38.0% |
Mean | 17.8% | 17.9% |
Median | 17.1% | 17.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.7% | 11.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.0% | 21.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.4% | 10.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.7% | 8.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.6% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Serbia and Okinawans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Serbia are Bulgarian (18.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Tongan (18.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Jordanian (18.8%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Romania (18.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Croatia (18.9%, a difference of 0.40%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Okinawans are Bulgarian (18.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Tongan (18.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Jordanian (18.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Romania (18.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Croatia (18.9%, a difference of 0.41%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Okinawans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Jordanians | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Romania | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 18.8% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 18.9% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 99.8 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 99.8 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 19.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 99.8 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 19.0% |