Immigrants from England vs Choctaw Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from England
Choctaw
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from England
Choctaw
20.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
91.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
27.2%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from England vs Choctaw Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 384,642,935 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.788 and weighted average of 20.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,534,581 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.421 and weighted average of 27.2%, a difference of 34.6%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from England | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 17.4% | 12.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 82.6% | 87.4% |
| Mean | 39.8% | 41.2% |
| Median | 32.0% | 38.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.2% | 31.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 47.2% | 46.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 25.0% | 15.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 26.0% | 16.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.5% | 16.4% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from England by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Pakistani (20.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Uruguayan (20.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Hungary (20.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Venezuela (20.2%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Morocco (20.2%, a difference of 0.11%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Serbians | 93.3 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 20.1% |
| Mongolians | 93.2 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 92.7 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 92.4 /100 | #129 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 92.3 /100 | #130 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Pakistanis | 92.1 /100 | #131 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Uruguayans | 92.1 /100 | #132 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | England | 91.9 /100 | #133 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 91.5 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 91.2 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 91.2 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 90.6 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Slovenes | 90.5 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 90.4 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 20.3% |
| Syrians | 90.4 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 20.3% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Creek (27.4%, a difference of 0.88%), Dutch West Indian (27.5%, a difference of 0.96%), Kiowa (26.9%, a difference of 0.98%), Chippewa (26.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and Seminole (26.8%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 26.3% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 26.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 26.6% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 26.8% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 26.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 27.2% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 27.4% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 27.5% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 27.7% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 27.8% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 28.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 28.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 28.3% |