Immigrants from England vs Chippewa Family Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from England
Chippewa
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from England
Chippewa
8.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
97.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
90th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
277th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from England vs Chippewa Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 390,846,172 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.507 and weighted average of 8.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,735,331 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.554 and weighted average of 11.2%, a difference of 41.0%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from England | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 1.6% | 4.7% |
| Maximum | 44.4% | 70.6% |
| Range | 42.8% | 65.9% |
| Mean | 11.1% | 19.0% |
| Median | 9.0% | 14.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.1% | 10.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.6% | 26.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 16.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.1% | 12.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.9% | 12.7% |
Similar Demographics by Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from England by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Immigrants from Denmark (8.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Serbian (8.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Italy (8.0%, a difference of 0.16%), Belgian (8.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and Scottish (7.9%, a difference of 0.30%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| British | 97.5 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 97.4 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Scottish | 97.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Belgians | 97.3 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | England | 97.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Guyanese (11.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Guyana (11.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Central American (11.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Spanish American (11.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Blackfeet (11.3%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 11.1% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Somalis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #276 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Chippewa | 0.1 /100 | #277 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #278 | Tragic 11.2% |
| Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 11.3% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 11.3% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 11.3% |
| Indonesians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 11.3% |
| Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 11.3% |