Immigrants from Bolivia vs Burmese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Bolivia
Burmese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Bolivia
Burmese
17.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Bolivia vs Burmese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 157,883,444 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bolivia and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.368 and weighted average of 17.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,450,200 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.055 and weighted average of 18.3%, a difference of 2.4%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Bolivia | Burmese |
Minimum | 3.6% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 82.5% | 43.2% |
Range | 78.9% | 41.3% |
Mean | 19.6% | 16.0% |
Median | 17.3% | 15.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.3% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.9% | 19.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.6% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.6% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.5% | 6.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Bolivia and Burmese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bolivia are Immigrants from South Central Asia (17.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Lithuania (17.8%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Ireland (17.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Bolivian (17.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and Indian (Asian) (17.9%, a difference of 0.59%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Asian (18.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Maltese (18.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Greece (18.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Armenian (18.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Singapore (18.3%, a difference of 0.33%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 17.3% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 17.5% |
Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 17.7% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 17.8% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 18.4% |