Australian vs Yup'ik Female Poverty
COMPARE
Australian
Yup'ik
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Australians
Yup'ik
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
95.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Australian vs Yup'ik Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,990,985 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.643 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,953,157 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.535 and weighted average of 21.5%, a difference of 72.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Australian | Yup'ik |
Minimum | 0.92% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 78.1% | 80.0% |
Range | 77.2% | 78.3% |
Mean | 14.9% | 23.8% |
Median | 11.6% | 18.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 12.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.8% | 32.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.1% | 20.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.3% | 15.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.2% | 15.4% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Australians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Native Hawaiian (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), British (12.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Romanian (12.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from South Africa (12.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Indonesia (12.5%, a difference of 0.14%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Belgians | 95.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Czechoslovakians | 95.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 95.5 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 95.4 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Hopi (21.0%, a difference of 2.5%), Sioux (20.9%, a difference of 2.9%), Crow (22.1%, a difference of 3.0%), Yuman (20.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and Pueblo (20.7%, a difference of 3.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 19.3% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 20.0% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 20.2% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 20.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 20.8% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 20.9% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 21.0% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 21.5% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 22.1% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 22.8% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 23.5% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 23.6% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 23.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 25.2% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 25.9% |