Immigrants from Ecuador vs Shoshone Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ecuador
 Shoshone
 Poverty
Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Ecuador
Shoshone
14.3%
POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.7%
POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
271st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Shoshone Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,887,290 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Ecuador and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.070 and weighted average of 14.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,616,342 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and poverty level in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.517 and weighted average of 14.7%, a difference of 2.6%.
 
Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Ecuador | Shoshone | 
| Minimum | 1.4% | 5.7% | 
| Maximum | 24.4% | 31.5% | 
| Range | 23.0% | 25.8% | 
| Mean | 13.6% | 17.1% | 
| Median | 13.3% | 14.9% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.9% | 11.0% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.7% | 23.8% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 12.8% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 7.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 7.0% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Ecuador and Shoshone by Poverty
In terms of poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Ecuador are Mexican American Indian (14.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (14.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Ottawa (14.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from El Salvador (14.3%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Nicaragua (14.3%, a difference of 0.34%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Chickasaw (14.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Central American (14.6%, a difference of 0.58%), Spanish American (14.7%, a difference of 0.58%), Immigrants from Cuba (14.6%, a difference of 0.72%), and Subsaharan African (14.5%, a difference of 0.88%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Poverty | 
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.2 /100 | #253  | Tragic 14.2%  | 
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #254  | Tragic 14.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #255  | Tragic 14.3%  | 
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #256  | Tragic 14.3%  | 
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.1 /100 | #257  | Tragic 14.3%  | 
| Ottawa | 0.1 /100 | #258  | Tragic 14.3%  | 
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #259  | Tragic 14.3%  | 
| Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #260  | Tragic 14.4%  | 
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #261  | Tragic 14.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #262  | Tragic 14.4%  | 
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #263  | Tragic 14.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #264  | Tragic 14.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #265  | Tragic 14.5%  | 
| Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #266  | Tragic 14.5%  | 
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #267  | Tragic 14.5%  | 
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #268  | Tragic 14.5%  | 
| Immigrants | Cuba | 0.1 /100 | #269  | Tragic 14.6%  | 
| Central Americans | 0.1 /100 | #270  | Tragic 14.6%  | 
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #271  | Tragic 14.7%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #272  | Tragic 14.7%  | 
| Spanish Americans | 0.0 /100 | #273  | Tragic 14.7%  |