Chickasaw vs Shoshone Single Mother Households
COMPARE
Chickasaw
 Shoshone
 Single Mother Households
Single Mother Households Comparison
Chickasaw
Shoshone
7.0%
SINGLE MOTHER HOUSEHOLDS
1.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
234th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.8%
SINGLE MOTHER HOUSEHOLDS
5.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
215th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Shoshone Single Mother Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,547,774 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of single mother households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.123 and weighted average of 7.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,546,675 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and percentage of single mother households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.236 and weighted average of 6.8%, a difference of 3.6%.
 
Single Mother Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Shoshone | 
| Minimum | 0.84% | 1.1% | 
| Maximum | 23.7% | 13.5% | 
| Range | 22.8% | 12.4% | 
| Mean | 7.2% | 6.6% | 
| Median | 6.9% | 5.6% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 5.0% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 7.6% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.5% | 2.6% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 3.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 3.2% | 
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Shoshone by Single Mother Households
In terms of single mother households, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Choctaw (7.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Comanche (7.0%, a difference of 0.19%), Spanish American (7.0%, a difference of 0.25%), Creek (7.0%, a difference of 0.27%), and Immigrants from Kenya (7.0%, a difference of 0.99%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Cherokee (6.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Aleut (6.8%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (6.8%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants (6.8%, a difference of 0.74%), and Immigrants from Uruguay (6.7%, a difference of 0.91%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Households | 
| Immigrants | Uruguay | 7.9 /100 | #214  | Tragic 6.7%  | 
| Shoshone | 5.7 /100 | #215  | Tragic 6.8%  | 
| Cherokee | 5.1 /100 | #216  | Tragic 6.8%  | 
| Aleuts | 4.8 /100 | #217  | Tragic 6.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 4.4 /100 | #218  | Tragic 6.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 4.3 /100 | #219  | Tragic 6.8%  | 
| Immigrants | Thailand | 4.0 /100 | #220  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| French American Indians | 3.7 /100 | #221  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 3.7 /100 | #222  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 3.6 /100 | #223  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Sudan | 3.5 /100 | #224  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #225  | Tragic 6.9%  | 
| Paiute | 2.4 /100 | #226  | Tragic 7.0%  | 
| Kenyans | 2.3 /100 | #227  | Tragic 7.0%  | 
| Iroquois | 2.2 /100 | #228  | Tragic 7.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Kenya | 2.1 /100 | #229  | Tragic 7.0%  | 
| Creek | 1.6 /100 | #230  | Tragic 7.0%  | 
| Spanish Americans | 1.6 /100 | #231  | Tragic 7.0%  | 
| Comanche | 1.5 /100 | #232  | Tragic 7.0%  | 
| Choctaw | 1.4 /100 | #233  | Tragic 7.0%  | 
| Chickasaw | 1.4 /100 | #234  | Tragic 7.0%  |