Chickasaw vs Shoshone Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Shoshone
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Chickasaw
Shoshone
19.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
262nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
245th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Shoshone Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,952,830 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.542 and weighted average of 19.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,320,610 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.556 and weighted average of 18.9%, a difference of 4.1%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Shoshone |
| Minimum | 3.8% | 2.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 50.0% |
| Range | 96.2% | 47.5% |
| Mean | 26.8% | 21.8% |
| Median | 21.7% | 18.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 17.6% | 14.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 31.3% | 29.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.6% | 14.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.5% | 11.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 15.4% | 10.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Shoshone by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Vietnamese (19.5%, a difference of 0.52%), Mexican American Indian (19.5%, a difference of 0.61%), Ottawa (19.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and Salvadoran (19.4%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Immigrants from Laos (18.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Ecuadorian (18.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (18.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Ghana (18.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and French American Indian (19.2%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.7 /100 | #243 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.7 /100 | #244 | Tragic 18.8% |
| Shoshone | 0.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 18.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 18.9% |
| French American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Cape Verdeans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 19.2% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 19.3% |
| Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
| Salvadorans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.5% |
| Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.5% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |