Canadian vs Nicaraguan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Canadian
Nicaraguan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Canadians
Nicaraguans
21.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
45.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
176th/ 347
METRIC RANK
21.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
27.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Canadian vs Nicaraguan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 428,352,495 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.416 and weighted average of 21.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 283,867,505 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Nicaraguans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.020 and weighted average of 21.3%, a difference of 1.2%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Canadian | Nicaraguan |
Minimum | 13.6% | 7.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 41.4% |
Range | 86.4% | 33.6% |
Mean | 39.9% | 21.5% |
Median | 32.8% | 21.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.7% | 17.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 53.0% | 24.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 28.3% | 7.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.1% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.7% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Canadians and Nicaraguans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Canadians are Scandinavian (21.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (21.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Czech (21.0%, a difference of 0.080%), British (21.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and Spanish American Indian (21.1%, a difference of 0.19%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Nicaraguans are Czechoslovakian (21.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Basque (21.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Jamaica (21.3%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Germany (21.3%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Cuba (21.2%, a difference of 0.55%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
Hungarians | 39.6 /100 | #184 | Fair 21.1% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 38.2 /100 | #185 | Fair 21.2% |
Hawaiians | 37.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 36.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 21.2% |
Yugoslavians | 35.4 /100 | #188 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 35.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 21.2% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 35.2 /100 | #190 | Fair 21.2% |
Immigrants | Germany | 31.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 21.3% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 30.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 21.3% |
Basques | 28.1 /100 | #193 | Fair 21.3% |
Czechoslovakians | 27.7 /100 | #194 | Fair 21.3% |
Nicaraguans | 27.6 /100 | #195 | Fair 21.3% |