Canadian vs Burmese Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Canadian
Burmese
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Canadians
Burmese
21.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
45.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
176th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.3%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Canadian vs Burmese Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 428,352,495 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.416 and weighted average of 21.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,450,200 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Burmese and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.055 and weighted average of 18.3%, a difference of 15.3%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Canadian | Burmese |
| Minimum | 13.6% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 43.2% |
| Range | 86.4% | 41.3% |
| Mean | 39.9% | 16.0% |
| Median | 32.8% | 15.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 24.7% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 53.0% | 19.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 28.3% | 7.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.1% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.7% | 6.5% |
Similar Demographics by Single Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Canadians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Canadians are Scandinavian (21.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (21.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Czech (21.0%, a difference of 0.080%), British (21.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and Spanish American Indian (21.1%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 56.3 /100 | #169 | Average 20.9% |
| New Zealanders | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 21.0% |
| Moroccans | 52.8 /100 | #171 | Average 21.0% |
| Guyanese | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 21.0% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 50.6 /100 | #173 | Average 21.0% |
| Cubans | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 21.0% |
| Czechs | 46.8 /100 | #175 | Average 21.0% |
| Canadians | 45.4 /100 | #176 | Average 21.1% |
| Scandinavians | 45.2 /100 | #177 | Average 21.1% |
| Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 44.9 /100 | #178 | Average 21.1% |
| British | 42.9 /100 | #179 | Average 21.1% |
| Spanish American Indians | 42.5 /100 | #180 | Average 21.1% |
| Europeans | 42.3 /100 | #181 | Average 21.1% |
| Slavs | 40.5 /100 | #182 | Average 21.1% |
| Slovaks | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 21.1% |
Demographics Similar to Burmese by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Asian (18.3%, a difference of 0.0%), Maltese (18.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Greece (18.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Armenian (18.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from Singapore (18.3%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 17.9% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 18.0% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 18.3% |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 18.4% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 18.5% |