Ute vs Lithuanian Births to Unmarried Women
COMPARE
Ute
Lithuanian
Births to Unmarried Women
Births to Unmarried Women Comparison
Ute
Lithuanians
33.0%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
14.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
29.6%
BIRTHS TO UNMARRIED WOMEN
94.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
104th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Lithuanian Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,718,542 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.121 and weighted average of 33.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 385,212,926 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Lithuanians and percentage of births to unmarried women in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.506 and weighted average of 29.6%, a difference of 11.7%.
Births to Unmarried Women Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Lithuanian |
Minimum | 12.5% | 7.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 87.5% | 92.3% |
Mean | 57.2% | 37.3% |
Median | 47.5% | 31.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 29.4% | 24.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 100.0% | 40.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 70.6% | 15.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 33.9% | 23.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 32.7% | 22.9% |
Similar Demographics by Births to Unmarried Women
Demographics Similar to Ute by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Africa (33.0%, a difference of 0.020%), German Russian (33.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Uruguayan (33.1%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Micronesia (32.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (32.9%, a difference of 0.39%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Immigrants | Colombia | 21.7 /100 | #196 | Fair 32.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 20.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 32.7% |
Costa Ricans | 20.3 /100 | #198 | Fair 32.7% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 18.9 /100 | #199 | Poor 32.8% |
Immigrants | Germany | 18.8 /100 | #200 | Poor 32.8% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 16.7 /100 | #201 | Poor 32.9% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 16.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 32.9% |
Ute | 14.4 /100 | #203 | Poor 33.0% |
Immigrants | Africa | 14.3 /100 | #204 | Poor 33.0% |
German Russians | 13.1 /100 | #205 | Poor 33.1% |
Uruguayans | 12.8 /100 | #206 | Poor 33.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 11.5 /100 | #207 | Poor 33.2% |
Hawaiians | 11.3 /100 | #208 | Poor 33.2% |
Whites/Caucasians | 10.7 /100 | #209 | Poor 33.3% |
Scotch-Irish | 10.7 /100 | #210 | Poor 33.3% |
Demographics Similar to Lithuanians by Births to Unmarried Women
In terms of births to unmarried women, the demographic groups most similar to Lithuanians are Lebanese (29.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (29.6%, a difference of 0.050%), Australian (29.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (29.5%, a difference of 0.14%), and Swedish (29.6%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Births to Unmarried Women |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.7 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 29.3% |
Immigrants | Syria | 95.7 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 29.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 29.4% |
Luxembourgers | 95.2 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 29.4% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 94.7 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 29.5% |
Australians | 94.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 29.5% |
Lebanese | 94.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 29.5% |
Lithuanians | 94.4 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 29.6% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 94.3 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 29.6% |
Swedes | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 29.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 93.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 29.6% |
Paraguayans | 93.5 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 29.7% |
Greeks | 93.4 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 29.7% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 93.4 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 29.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 93.0 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 29.7% |