Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Oceania Currently Married
COMPARE
Bhutanese
 Immigrants from Oceania
 Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Bhutanese
Immigrants from Oceania
48.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
99.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.5%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
44.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
179th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Bhutanese vs Immigrants from Oceania Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,493,629 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.161 and weighted average of 48.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,491,409 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.259 and weighted average of 46.5%, a difference of 4.5%.
 
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Bhutanese | Immigrants from Oceania | 
| Minimum | 25.4% | 16.2% | 
| Maximum | 78.5% | 91.9% | 
| Range | 53.1% | 75.7% | 
| Mean | 49.2% | 44.8% | 
| Median | 50.1% | 46.2% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 45.2% | 40.3% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 54.0% | 48.5% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.9% | 8.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.3% | 13.7% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.3% | 13.5% | 
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Bhutanese by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Iranian (48.6%, a difference of 0.060%), White/Caucasian (48.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Austrian (48.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Northern European (48.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and Immigrants from Iran (48.7%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married | 
| Finns | 99.3 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 48.8% | 
| Scotch-Irish | 99.3 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 48.7% | 
| Immigrants | North America | 99.3 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 48.7% | 
| Belgians | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 48.7% | 
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 48.7% | 
| Northern Europeans | 99.2 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 48.7% | 
| Austrians | 99.2 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 48.7% | 
| Bhutanese | 99.1 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 48.6% | 
| Iranians | 99.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 48.6% | 
| Whites/Caucasians | 99.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 48.6% | 
| Russians | 98.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 48.6% | 
| Immigrants | Austria | 98.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 48.5% | 
| Immigrants | Moldova | 98.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 48.5% | 
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 98.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 48.5% | 
| Latvians | 98.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 48.5% | 
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Costa Rican (46.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Ottawa (46.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Potawatomi (46.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Chickasaw (46.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married | 
| Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% | 
| Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% | 
| Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% | 
| Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% | 
| Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% | 
| Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% | 
| Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% | 
| Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% | 
| Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% | 
| Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% | 
| Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% | 
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% | 
| Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% | 
| Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% | 
| Immigrants | Chile | 36.8 /100 | #186 | Fair 46.4% |