Immigrants from Afghanistan vs Chickasaw Male Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Chickasaw
Male Disability
Male Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Chickasaw
10.5%
MALE DISABILITY
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
67th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
MALE DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Afghanistan vs Chickasaw Male Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,637,072 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Afghanistan and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.190 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,685,248 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of males with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.455 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 44.6%.
Male Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Afghanistan | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 2.9% | 6.7% |
| Maximum | 20.7% | 56.8% |
| Range | 17.8% | 50.1% |
| Mean | 10.6% | 22.9% |
| Median | 10.2% | 21.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.1% | 17.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.1% | 24.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.0% | 7.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.8% | 9.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.7% | 9.1% |
Similar Demographics by Male Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan are Immigrants from Grenada (10.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Guyanese (10.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Jordanian (10.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Colombian (10.5%, a difference of 0.10%), and Ecuadorian (10.5%, a difference of 0.10%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 99.5 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 99.3 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 99.3 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Jordanians | 99.3 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Grenada | 99.2 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Guyanese | 99.2 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.2 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Colombians | 99.2 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Ecuadorians | 99.2 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.1 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 99.0 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.0 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 98.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 98.8 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Disability
In terms of male disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Lumbee (15.2%, a difference of 0.74%), Pueblo (15.0%, a difference of 0.80%), Menominee (15.0%, a difference of 0.91%), Alaskan Athabascan (14.9%, a difference of 1.4%), and Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Disability |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.7% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 15.0% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.1% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.5% |