Immigrants from Afghanistan vs Chickasaw Disability
COMPARE
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Chickasaw
Disability
Disability Comparison
Immigrants from Afghanistan
Chickasaw
11.0%
DISABILITY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
68th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Afghanistan vs Chickasaw Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,638,051 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Afghanistan and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.290 and weighted average of 11.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,689,192 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 38.0%.
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from Afghanistan | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 4.8% | 8.6% |
| Maximum | 22.3% | 52.4% |
| Range | 17.5% | 43.9% |
| Mean | 11.2% | 22.5% |
| Median | 10.7% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.1% | 17.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.3% | 23.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 6.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.6% | 8.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.6% | 8.5% |
Similar Demographics by Disability
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Afghanistan are Colombian (11.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Laotian (11.0%, a difference of 0.20%), Sri Lankan (11.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Bulgarian (11.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and Immigrants from Sweden (11.0%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.7 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.7 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 99.7 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.6 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Bulgarians | 99.6 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Laotians | 99.6 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Colombians | 99.6 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.6 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Sri Lankans | 99.5 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | France | 99.4 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.4 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 99.4 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 99.4 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Serbia | 99.4 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.5%), Dutch West Indian (14.9%, a difference of 1.8%), Seminole (14.9%, a difference of 2.1%), Cherokee (14.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and Lumbee (15.5%, a difference of 2.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.4% |
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.8% |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 14.9% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.2% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 16.1% |