Ute vs Comanche Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Ute
Comanche
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Ute
Comanche
21.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
20.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
276th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Comanche Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,563,406 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.294 and weighted average of 21.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,392,517 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.166 and weighted average of 20.2%, a difference of 8.0%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Comanche |
| Minimum | 9.6% | 5.6% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 50.0% |
| Range | 90.4% | 44.4% |
| Mean | 33.1% | 26.3% |
| Median | 25.0% | 22.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.3% | 18.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 39.5% | 38.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.2% | 19.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.6% | 12.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.1% | 12.5% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Ute by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Immigrants from Guatemala (21.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Arapaho (21.7%, a difference of 0.28%), Creek (21.7%, a difference of 0.29%), African (21.9%, a difference of 0.59%), and Immigrants from Mexico (21.6%, a difference of 0.80%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 21.5% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 21.6% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 21.7% |
| Ute | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 21.8% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Africans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 21.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 22.1% |
| U.S. Virgin Islanders | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 22.1% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 22.2% |
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 22.5% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 22.6% |
Demographics Similar to Comanche by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Belizean (20.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Barbadian (20.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Zaire (20.2%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Liberia (20.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and Subsaharan African (20.1%, a difference of 0.32%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
| Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 19.9% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 20.0% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 20.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 20.1% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 20.2% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 20.2% |
| West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 20.3% |
| Senegalese | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 20.3% |