Ute vs Comanche Single Mother Poverty
COMPARE
Ute
Comanche
Single Mother Poverty
Single Mother Poverty Comparison
Ute
Comanche
35.7%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
325th/ 347
METRIC RANK
33.9%
SINGLE MOTHER POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
307th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Comanche Single Mother Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,474,720 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ute and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.002 and weighted average of 35.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,063,480 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among single mothers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.315 and weighted average of 33.9%, a difference of 5.3%.

Single Mother Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ute | Comanche |
Minimum | 21.7% | 13.6% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 73.0% |
Range | 78.3% | 59.3% |
Mean | 53.3% | 42.2% |
Median | 47.4% | 39.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 37.9% | 33.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 66.2% | 52.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 28.3% | 18.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.8% | 13.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.3% | 13.6% |
Demographics Similar to Ute and Comanche by Single Mother Poverty
In terms of single mother poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Seminole (35.8%, a difference of 0.30%), Ottawa (35.5%, a difference of 0.48%), Kiowa (35.5%, a difference of 0.69%), Black/African American (35.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and Paiute (35.1%, a difference of 1.6%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Immigrants from Mexico (34.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Congo (33.8%, a difference of 0.41%), Potawatomi (34.1%, a difference of 0.60%), Honduran (34.2%, a difference of 0.82%), and Alsatian (34.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Mother Poverty |
Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 33.8% |
Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 33.9% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 34.0% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 34.1% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 34.2% |
Alsatians | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 34.3% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 34.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 34.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 34.4% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 34.5% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 34.5% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 34.5% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 34.7% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 34.8% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 34.8% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 35.1% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 35.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 35.5% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 35.5% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 35.7% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 35.8% |