Ute vs Celtic Vision Disability
COMPARE
Ute
 Celtic
 Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Ute
Celtics
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
267th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.4%
VISION DISABILITY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
269th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ute vs Celtic Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,653,653 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.323 and weighted average of 2.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,807,792 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.062 and weighted average of 2.4%, a difference of 0.36%.
 
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ute | Celtic | 
| Minimum | 1.2% | 0.40% | 
| Maximum | 7.6% | 12.3% | 
| Range | 6.4% | 11.9% | 
| Mean | 2.9% | 3.6% | 
| Median | 2.5% | 2.8% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.1% | 2.3% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.5% | 4.2% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.5% | 1.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.5% | 2.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.4% | 2.2% | 
Demographics Similar to Ute and Celtics by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Mexican American Indian (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Jamaica (2.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Liberia (2.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Senegalese (2.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Belize (2.4%, a difference of 0.20%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Cuban (2.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from the Azores (2.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Senegalese (2.4%, a difference of 0.27%), Spaniard (2.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and Mexican American Indian (2.4%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability | 
| British West Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.2 /100 | #259  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Belizeans | 0.2 /100 | #260  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Fijians | 0.1 /100 | #261  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #262  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Belize | 0.1 /100 | #263  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #264  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #266  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Ute | 0.1 /100 | #267  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Senegalese | 0.1 /100 | #268  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Celtics | 0.1 /100 | #269  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Cubans | 0.1 /100 | #270  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.1 /100 | #271  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Spaniards | 0.1 /100 | #272  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.1 /100 | #273  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #274  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #275  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #276  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Bahamians | 0.0 /100 | #277  | Tragic 2.4%  | 
| Spanish | 0.0 /100 | #278  | Tragic 2.4%  |