Japanese vs Chilean Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Japanese
Chilean
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Japanese
Chileans
17.7%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
4.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
219th/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.8%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
94.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
107th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Japanese vs Chilean Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 248,294,497 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Japanese and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.414 and weighted average of 17.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 255,499,348 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chileans and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.115 and weighted average of 14.8%, a difference of 19.1%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Japanese | Chilean |
Minimum | 0.73% | 2.6% |
Maximum | 63.1% | 57.2% |
Range | 62.3% | 54.6% |
Mean | 22.5% | 15.3% |
Median | 20.6% | 13.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.9% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.2% | 16.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 7.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.0% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.9% | 11.5% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Demographics Similar to Japanese by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Japanese are Moroccan (17.6%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (17.6%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Panama (17.7%, a difference of 0.40%), Sierra Leonean (17.6%, a difference of 0.56%), and Malaysian (17.5%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 6.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.5% |
Immigrants | Azores | 6.2 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.5% |
Iraqis | 5.9 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.5% |
Malaysians | 5.9 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 5.7 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 5.3 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.6% |
Moroccans | 5.3 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.6% |
Japanese | 4.7 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 17.7% |
Cubans | 3.7 /100 | #221 | Tragic 17.8% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 3.6 /100 | #222 | Tragic 17.8% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 3.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 17.8% |
Osage | 3.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 17.9% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 17.9% |
Bermudans | 2.6 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chileans by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chileans are Serbian (14.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Jordanian (14.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Tlingit-Haida (14.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Basque (14.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from England (14.8%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Dutch | 95.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Romanians | 95.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 94.9 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | England | 94.8 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Basques | 94.7 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Serbians | 94.5 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Chileans | 94.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Jordanians | 94.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Tlingit-Haida | 94.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 14.9% |
English | 93.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 93.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Irish | 93.4 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Belgians | 93.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Sri Lankans | 93.2 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 14.9% |