Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Celtic Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Celtic
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago
Celtics
15.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
251st/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
49.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
175th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Celtic Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 223,462,695 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.583 and weighted average of 15.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,846,795 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.728 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 14.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago | Celtic |
Minimum | 0.35% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 80.6% | 100.0% |
Range | 80.3% | 97.8% |
Mean | 14.7% | 15.9% |
Median | 13.7% | 12.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.4% | 10.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.1% | 18.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 12.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.7% | 12.5% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago are Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (15.4%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Africa (15.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Salvadoran (15.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Liberian (15.4%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Spain (13.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Iraq (13.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Morocco (13.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), and Israeli (13.5%, a difference of 0.080%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Syria | 48.8 /100 | #179 | Average 13.5% |
South Americans | 44.8 /100 | #180 | Average 13.5% |
Venezuelans | 44.5 /100 | #181 | Average 13.5% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 44.5 /100 | #182 | Average 13.5% |