Houma vs Lumbee Disability
COMPARE
Houma
 Lumbee
 Disability
Disability Comparison
Houma
Lumbee
17.1%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.5%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma vs Lumbee Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,799,095 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.872 and weighted average of 17.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 92,289,178 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Lumbee and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.475 and weighted average of 15.5%, a difference of 10.4%.
 
Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Houma | Lumbee | 
| Minimum | 11.9% | 3.9% | 
| Maximum | 47.0% | 41.7% | 
| Range | 35.2% | 37.8% | 
| Mean | 20.3% | 19.4% | 
| Median | 17.0% | 17.5% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.9% | 16.6% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.2% | 21.8% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 5.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 7.0% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 6.9% | 
Demographics Similar to Houma and Lumbee by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Tsimshian (16.1%, a difference of 6.2%), Puerto Rican (16.1%, a difference of 6.4%), Colville (15.8%, a difference of 8.6%), Creek (15.6%, a difference of 9.9%), and Kiowa (15.6%, a difference of 9.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Lumbee are Kiowa (15.6%, a difference of 0.45%), Creek (15.6%, a difference of 0.47%), Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 0.84%), Colville (15.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and Chickasaw (15.2%, a difference of 2.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability | 
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #328  | Tragic 14.2%  | 
| Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #329  | Tragic 14.2%  | 
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330  | Tragic 14.3%  | 
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #331  | Tragic 14.4%  | 
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #332  | Tragic 14.4%  | 
| Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333  | Tragic 14.6%  | 
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334  | Tragic 14.6%  | 
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #335  | Tragic 14.8%  | 
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #336  | Tragic 14.8%  | 
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #337  | Tragic 14.9%  | 
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338  | Tragic 14.9%  | 
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339  | Tragic 15.2%  | 
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340  | Tragic 15.4%  | 
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341  | Tragic 15.5%  | 
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342  | Tragic 15.6%  | 
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343  | Tragic 15.6%  | 
| Colville | 0.0 /100 | #344  | Tragic 15.8%  | 
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345  | Tragic 16.1%  | 
| Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #346  | Tragic 16.1%  | 
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347  | Tragic 17.1%  |