Chippewa vs Canadian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Chippewa
Canadian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Chippewa
Canadians
20.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
291st/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
87.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
142nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chippewa vs Canadian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,813,465 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.439 and weighted average of 20.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 426,709,261 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.655 and weighted average of 15.6%, a difference of 32.6%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chippewa | Canadian |
Minimum | 7.5% | 8.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 92.5% | 91.9% |
Mean | 37.7% | 33.6% |
Median | 27.8% | 23.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 18.9% | 14.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 56.3% | 48.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 37.5% | 33.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.5% | 27.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 25.4% | 27.1% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Immigrants from Latin America (20.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Grenada (20.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Haiti (20.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Belize (20.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Senegal (20.7%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 20.3% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 20.3% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 20.4% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 20.5% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 20.5% |
Immigrants | Belize | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants | Haiti | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 20.6% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 20.6% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants | Senegal | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants | Caribbean | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 20.7% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 20.7% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 20.8% |
Mexicans | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 20.9% |
Demographics Similar to Canadians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Canadians are Immigrants from Jordan (15.6%, a difference of 0.020%), New Zealander (15.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Peru (15.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Armenian (15.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and Israeli (15.6%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Czechoslovakians | 89.0 /100 | #135 | Excellent 15.5% |
Native Hawaiians | 89.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 15.5% |
South Africans | 88.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 88.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 15.5% |
Armenians | 87.9 /100 | #139 | Excellent 15.5% |
New Zealanders | 87.2 /100 | #140 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 87.2 /100 | #141 | Excellent 15.6% |
Canadians | 87.1 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.6% |
Immigrants | Peru | 86.6 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.6% |
Israelis | 86.3 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.6% |
Welsh | 85.4 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.6% |
Samoans | 84.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.7% |
Slavs | 83.1 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.7% |
Icelanders | 82.4 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.7% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 80.9 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |