Aleut vs Cherokee In Labor Force | Age 16-19
COMPARE
Aleut
 Cherokee
 In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Comparison
Aleuts
Cherokee
40.4%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
58th/ 347
METRIC RANK
40.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
62nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Aleut vs Cherokee In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,744,567 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 40.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 492,065,053 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.191 and weighted average of 40.2%, a difference of 0.47%.
 
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Aleut | Cherokee | 
| Minimum | 14.1% | 14.7% | 
| Maximum | 100.0% | 82.7% | 
| Range | 85.9% | 68.0% | 
| Mean | 50.6% | 39.1% | 
| Median | 45.1% | 40.3% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 38.2% | 32.8% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 57.3% | 44.6% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.1% | 11.9% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.4% | 12.3% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.1% | 12.3% | 
Demographics Similar to Aleuts and Cherokee by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Lithuanian (40.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Fijian (40.4%, a difference of 0.040%), British (40.5%, a difference of 0.13%), Slavic (40.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and Tlingit-Haida (40.5%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Northern European (40.2%, a difference of 0.060%), American (40.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Micronesia (40.2%, a difference of 0.17%), Kenyan (40.1%, a difference of 0.25%), and Immigrants from Eastern Africa (40.4%, a difference of 0.29%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | 
| Indonesians | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 40.7% | 
| Immigrants | Zaire | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 40.7% | 
| Immigrants | Laos | 100.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 40.6% | 
| Immigrants | Kenya | 100.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 40.5% | 
| Tlingit-Haida | 100.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 40.5% | 
| British | 100.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 40.5% | 
| Fijians | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 40.4% | 
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 40.4% | 
| Aleuts | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 40.4% | 
| Slavs | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 40.4% | 
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 40.4% | 
| Americans | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 40.3% | 
| Cherokee | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 40.2% | 
| Northern Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 40.2% | 
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 100.0 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 40.2% | 
| Kenyans | 100.0 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 40.1% | 
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 100.0 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 40.1% | 
| Canadians | 100.0 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 40.1% | 
| Italians | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 40.1% | 
| Potawatomi | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 40.0% | 
| Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 40.0% |