Portuguese vs Immigrants from Sudan Single Father Poverty
COMPARE
Portuguese
Immigrants from Sudan
Single Father Poverty
Single Father Poverty Comparison
Portuguese
Immigrants from Sudan
16.2%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
62.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
158th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.2%
SINGLE FATHER POVERTY
59.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
160th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Portuguese vs Immigrants from Sudan Single Father Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 344,973,459 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.086 and weighted average of 16.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 108,710,355 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan and poverty level among single fathers in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.502 and weighted average of 16.2%, a difference of 0.12%.
Single Father Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Portuguese | Immigrants from Sudan |
| Minimum | 5.2% | 0.76% |
| Maximum | 69.3% | 100.0% |
| Range | 64.1% | 99.2% |
| Mean | 20.6% | 25.5% |
| Median | 16.6% | 16.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 11.5% | 13.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.1% | 30.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.6% | 17.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.8% | 22.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.6% | 21.9% |
Demographics Similar to Portuguese and Immigrants from Sudan by Single Father Poverty
In terms of single father poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (16.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Belizean (16.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Jordan (16.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Estonian (16.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Nicaragua (16.2%, a difference of 0.27%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sudan are Belizean (16.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (16.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Estonian (16.2%, a difference of 0.14%), Ugandan (16.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (16.3%, a difference of 0.18%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Poverty |
| South Africans | 75.1 /100 | #149 | Good 16.1% |
| Jordanians | 74.2 /100 | #150 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 73.1 /100 | #151 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 72.1 /100 | #152 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 72.0 /100 | #153 | Good 16.1% |
| Mexicans | 70.1 /100 | #154 | Good 16.1% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 67.8 /100 | #155 | Good 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 66.0 /100 | #156 | Good 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 62.8 /100 | #157 | Good 16.2% |
| Portuguese | 62.3 /100 | #158 | Good 16.2% |
| Belizeans | 59.9 /100 | #159 | Average 16.2% |
| Immigrants | Sudan | 59.8 /100 | #160 | Average 16.2% |
| Estonians | 56.7 /100 | #161 | Average 16.2% |
| Ugandans | 55.9 /100 | #162 | Average 16.3% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 55.7 /100 | #163 | Average 16.3% |
| Guyanese | 55.2 /100 | #164 | Average 16.3% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 55.1 /100 | #165 | Average 16.3% |
| Immigrants | Europe | 54.8 /100 | #166 | Average 16.3% |
| Yugoslavians | 53.9 /100 | #167 | Average 16.3% |
| Costa Ricans | 53.6 /100 | #168 | Average 16.3% |
| Northern Europeans | 52.8 /100 | #169 | Average 16.3% |