Luxembourger vs Chippewa Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
Luxembourger
Chippewa
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
Luxembourgers
Chippewa
13.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
3.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
236th/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.4%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
319th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Luxembourger vs Chippewa Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 133,228,824 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Luxembourgers and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.205 and weighted average of 13.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 198,626,002 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chippewa and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.305 and weighted average of 16.4%, a difference of 22.6%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Luxembourger | Chippewa |
| Minimum | 4.0% | 9.5% |
| Maximum | 48.3% | 77.8% |
| Range | 44.3% | 68.3% |
| Mean | 22.6% | 26.4% |
| Median | 20.9% | 23.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.5% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 33.9% | 30.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 21.4% | 13.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.4% | 14.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.1% | 14.5% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to Luxembourgers by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Luxembourgers are Bangladeshi (13.3%, a difference of 0.050%), British West Indian (13.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Canadian (13.3%, a difference of 0.15%), British (13.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Ghana (13.4%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Europeans | 6.2 /100 | #229 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Ghanaians | 6.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Slavs | 5.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Caribbean | 5.0 /100 | #232 | Tragic 13.3% |
| British | 4.0 /100 | #233 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Canadians | 4.0 /100 | #234 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Bangladeshis | 3.7 /100 | #235 | Tragic 13.3% |
| Luxembourgers | 3.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 13.4% |
| British West Indians | 3.4 /100 | #237 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 3.2 /100 | #238 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Czechoslovakians | 3.0 /100 | #239 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Belizeans | 2.3 /100 | #240 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 2.1 /100 | #241 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 2.1 /100 | #242 | Tragic 13.4% |
| Barbadians | 2.1 /100 | #243 | Tragic 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chippewa by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chippewa are Chickasaw (16.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.48%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.61%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.5%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |
| Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 17.2% |