Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Asia Family Poverty
COMPARE
Czechoslovakian
Immigrants from Asia
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Czechoslovakians
Immigrants from Asia
8.0%
FAMILY POVERTY
96.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.9%
FAMILY POVERTY
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Czechoslovakian vs Immigrants from Asia Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 367,669,162 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.429 and weighted average of 8.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 545,488,463 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.146 and weighted average of 7.9%, a difference of 0.75%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Czechoslovakian | Immigrants from Asia |
Minimum | 1.1% | 2.2% |
Maximum | 23.0% | 17.3% |
Range | 21.9% | 15.0% |
Mean | 9.4% | 7.2% |
Median | 7.6% | 6.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 6.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.1% | 8.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.9% | 2.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 2.5% |
Demographics Similar to Czechoslovakians and Immigrants from Asia by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Czechoslovakians are Tlingit-Haida (8.0%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Italy (8.0%, a difference of 0.24%), Immigrants from Pakistan (8.0%, a difference of 0.29%), Immigrants from Philippines (8.0%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from Turkey (8.0%, a difference of 0.32%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Asia are Scottish (7.9%, a difference of 0.040%), Belgian (8.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Serbian (8.0%, a difference of 0.20%), British (7.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and Immigrants from Denmark (8.0%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | North America | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 7.9% |
English | 97.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Irish | 97.8 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Poland | 97.8 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Slovaks | 97.7 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 7.9% |
British | 97.5 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Asia | 97.4 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Scottish | 97.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Belgians | 97.3 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | England | 97.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Czechoslovakians | 96.8 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Tlingit-Haida | 96.7 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 96.6 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 96.5 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 96.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 96.1 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 95.9 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 8.1% |