Chinese vs Choctaw Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Chinese
Choctaw
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Chinese
Choctaw
8.3%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.4%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
14.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
206th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Choctaw Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,726,533 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.020 and weighted average of 8.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,951,728 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Choctaw and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.242 and weighted average of 11.4%, a difference of 36.3%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Choctaw |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 20.4% | 39.1% |
| Range | 18.8% | 36.6% |
| Mean | 8.4% | 16.1% |
| Median | 8.1% | 13.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 11.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.7% | 18.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 7.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 8.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 8.1% |
Similar Demographics by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Tlingit-Haida (8.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Norwegian (8.7%, a difference of 4.2%), Swedish (8.7%, a difference of 4.8%), Immigrants from India (8.8%, a difference of 5.2%), and Danish (8.8%, a difference of 5.7%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 8.8% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 8.8% |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| English | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Croatians | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Poles | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Demographics Similar to Choctaw by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Choctaw are Brazilian (11.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Western Asia (11.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Israeli (11.3%, a difference of 0.32%), Immigrants from Zaire (11.3%, a difference of 0.38%), and Costa Rican (11.3%, a difference of 0.39%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
| Immigrants | Israel | 20.3 /100 | #199 | Fair 11.3% |
| Alsatians | 20.1 /100 | #200 | Fair 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 17.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 11.3% |
| Costa Ricans | 17.0 /100 | #202 | Poor 11.3% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 16.9 /100 | #203 | Poor 11.3% |
| Israelis | 16.5 /100 | #204 | Poor 11.3% |
| Brazilians | 15.4 /100 | #205 | Poor 11.3% |
| Choctaw | 14.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 11.4% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 13.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 11.4% |
| South American Indians | 11.7 /100 | #208 | Poor 11.4% |
| Paraguayans | 11.3 /100 | #209 | Poor 11.4% |
| Ugandans | 11.2 /100 | #210 | Poor 11.4% |
| Indonesians | 10.4 /100 | #211 | Poor 11.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 9.5 /100 | #212 | Tragic 11.5% |
| Nepalese | 8.9 /100 | #213 | Tragic 11.5% |