Chinese vs Norwegian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
COMPARE
Chinese
Norwegian
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Comparison
Chinese
Norwegians
8.3%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.7%
SENIORS POVERTY OVER THE AGE OF 65
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
3rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Norwegian Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,726,533 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.020 and weighted average of 8.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 529,132,096 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and poverty level among seniors over the age of 65 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.438 and weighted average of 8.7%, a difference of 4.2%.
Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Norwegian |
| Minimum | 1.5% | 2.6% |
| Maximum | 20.4% | 75.0% |
| Range | 18.8% | 72.4% |
| Mean | 8.4% | 11.7% |
| Median | 8.1% | 8.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 10.7% | 11.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 10.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 10.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Norwegians by Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65
In terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Tlingit-Haida (8.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Swedish (8.7%, a difference of 4.8%), Immigrants from India (8.8%, a difference of 5.2%), Danish (8.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and German (9.0%, a difference of 7.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Swedish (8.7%, a difference of 0.60%), Immigrants from India (8.8%, a difference of 0.96%), Danish (8.8%, a difference of 1.4%), German (9.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and Czech (9.0%, a difference of 3.6%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Seniors Poverty Over the Age of 65 |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 8.8% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 8.8% |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.0% |
| English | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Lithuanians | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Maltese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Scandinavians | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Croatians | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Poles | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Dutch | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.1% |
| Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Scottish | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Slovaks | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.2% |
| Thais | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.2% |