Turkish vs Comanche Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Turkish
Comanche
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Turks
Comanche
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Comanche Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,078,353 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 4.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,532,955 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.677 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 38.6%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Comanche |
| Minimum | 0.78% | 3.4% |
| Maximum | 16.2% | 50.0% |
| Range | 15.5% | 46.6% |
| Mean | 4.6% | 8.4% |
| Median | 3.6% | 6.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.9% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 8.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 8.3% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Turks by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Comanche by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Immigrants from Somalia (6.0%, a difference of 0.15%), African (6.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Western Asia (6.0%, a difference of 0.30%), Bangladeshi (6.0%, a difference of 0.50%), and Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (6.0%, a difference of 0.74%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Cree | 1.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Tsimshian | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.1 /100 | #250 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 5.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 0.7 /100 | #252 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Africans | 0.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Somalia | 0.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Comanche | 0.7 /100 | #255 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #256 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.5 /100 | #257 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 0.5 /100 | #258 | Tragic 6.0% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.4 /100 | #259 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Jamaicans | 0.3 /100 | #260 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Senegalese | 0.3 /100 | #261 | Tragic 6.1% |
| Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #262 | Tragic 6.1% |