Turkish vs Yugoslavian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Turkish
Yugoslavian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Turks
Yugoslavians
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
97.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Yugoslavian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,078,353 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 4.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 284,040,939 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Yugoslavians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.061 and weighted average of 4.6%, a difference of 7.5%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | Yugoslavian |
Minimum | 0.78% | 0.92% |
Maximum | 16.2% | 14.3% |
Range | 15.5% | 13.4% |
Mean | 4.6% | 4.9% |
Median | 3.6% | 4.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 2.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.9% | 4.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 2.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 3.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 3.3% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Turks by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Yugoslavians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Yugoslavians are Immigrants from Western Europe (4.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Europe (4.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Native Hawaiian (4.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Asian (4.7%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Belgium (4.6%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Italy | 98.3 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Portuguese | 98.3 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Poland | 98.3 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 98.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Native Hawaiians | 98.0 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.9 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 97.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Yugoslavians | 97.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 4.6% |
Asians | 97.6 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Romania | 97.3 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 97.1 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Aleuts | 97.0 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | France | 96.9 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Immigrants | Germany | 96.8 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 4.7% |
Laotians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 4.7% |