Turkish vs Comanche Family Households
COMPARE
Turkish
Comanche
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Turks
Comanche
63.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
4.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
224th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.5%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
2.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
237th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Comanche Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,710,288 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Turks and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.422 and weighted average of 63.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,767,909 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.713 and weighted average of 63.5%, a difference of 0.27%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Comanche |
| Minimum | 35.7% | 47.4% |
| Maximum | 81.5% | 100.0% |
| Range | 45.8% | 52.6% |
| Mean | 65.5% | 69.1% |
| Median | 64.5% | 66.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 62.3% | 63.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 69.1% | 73.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.8% | 10.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.4% | 10.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.3% | 10.3% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Comanche by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Immigrants from Hungary (63.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Bahamas (63.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (63.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Belarus (63.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and French Canadian (63.7%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Ghanaian (63.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (63.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Albanian (63.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Aleut (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%), and South African (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Immigrants | Europe | 6.4 /100 | #220 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 5.9 /100 | #221 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 5.5 /100 | #222 | Tragic 63.7% |
| French Canadians | 5.4 /100 | #223 | Tragic 63.7% |
| Turks | 4.5 /100 | #224 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 4.3 /100 | #225 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Bahamas | 4.2 /100 | #226 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 4.1 /100 | #227 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Blackfeet | 3.6 /100 | #228 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Bulgarians | 3.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 3.0 /100 | #230 | Tragic 63.6% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 2.6 /100 | #232 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 2.6 /100 | #233 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Finns | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Albanians | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Ghanaians | 2.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Comanche | 2.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 2.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 63.5% |
| Aleuts | 1.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 63.4% |
| South Africans | 1.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 63.4% |