Turkish vs Pueblo Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Turkish
Pueblo
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Turks
Pueblo
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.1%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
341st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Pueblo Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,078,353 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 4.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,779,377 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Pueblo and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.398 and weighted average of 11.1%, a difference of 157.7%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | Pueblo |
Minimum | 0.78% | 0.23% |
Maximum | 16.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 15.5% | 99.8% |
Mean | 4.6% | 20.5% |
Median | 3.6% | 10.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 7.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.9% | 23.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 16.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 23.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 23.5% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Turks by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Pueblo by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Pueblo are Tohono O'odham (11.2%, a difference of 0.93%), Pima (11.4%, a difference of 2.6%), Navajo (11.9%, a difference of 6.6%), Puerto Rican (12.6%, a difference of 13.7%), and Yuman (9.7%, a difference of 14.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 8.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 8.4% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 8.7% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 9.0% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 9.0% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 9.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 9.6% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 9.7% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 11.1% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 11.2% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 11.4% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 11.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 12.6% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 12.8% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 13.4% |