Turkish vs South American Indian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Turkish
South American Indian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Turks
South American Indians
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
32.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
189th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs South American Indian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,078,353 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 4.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,101,002 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of South American Indians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.249 and weighted average of 5.3%, a difference of 23.5%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | South American Indian |
Minimum | 0.78% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 16.2% | 16.7% |
Range | 15.5% | 15.0% |
Mean | 4.6% | 6.0% |
Median | 3.6% | 5.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 3.8% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.9% | 6.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 2.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 3.4% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Turks by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to South American Indians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South American Indians are Israeli (5.3%, a difference of 0.090%), Ugandan (5.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Albania (5.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (5.3%, a difference of 0.20%), and Cape Verdean (5.3%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 37.7 /100 | #182 | Fair 5.3% |
Peruvians | 37.6 /100 | #183 | Fair 5.3% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 35.8 /100 | #184 | Fair 5.3% |
Americans | 35.4 /100 | #185 | Fair 5.3% |
Hungarians | 34.7 /100 | #186 | Fair 5.3% |
Immigrants | Albania | 33.8 /100 | #187 | Fair 5.3% |
Israelis | 33.1 /100 | #188 | Fair 5.3% |
South American Indians | 32.5 /100 | #189 | Fair 5.3% |
Ugandans | 31.6 /100 | #190 | Fair 5.3% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 30.9 /100 | #191 | Fair 5.3% |
Cape Verdeans | 30.7 /100 | #192 | Fair 5.3% |
Malaysians | 29.5 /100 | #193 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 27.8 /100 | #194 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Azores | 27.5 /100 | #195 | Fair 5.4% |
Spaniards | 27.4 /100 | #196 | Fair 5.4% |