Cherokee vs Comanche Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Cherokee
Comanche
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Cherokee
Comanche
5.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
2.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
238th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.0%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
0.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
255th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Comanche Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 487,541,023 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.411 and weighted average of 5.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,532,955 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.677 and weighted average of 6.0%, a difference of 3.7%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cherokee | Comanche |
Minimum | 3.4% | 3.4% |
Maximum | 54.5% | 50.0% |
Range | 51.1% | 46.6% |
Mean | 10.6% | 8.4% |
Median | 7.7% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 12.0% | 8.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.8% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.2% | 8.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 8.3% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee and Comanche by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Venezuelan (5.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Fijian (5.8%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Panama (5.8%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Western Africa (5.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from South America (5.7%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Comanche are Immigrants from Somalia (6.0%, a difference of 0.15%), African (6.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Western Asia (6.0%, a difference of 0.30%), Bangladeshi (6.0%, a difference of 0.50%), and Immigrants from Ghana (5.9%, a difference of 0.94%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
Ghanaians | 3.3 /100 | #236 | Tragic 5.7% |
Immigrants | South America | 3.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 5.7% |
Cherokee | 2.7 /100 | #238 | Tragic 5.8% |
Venezuelans | 2.7 /100 | #239 | Tragic 5.8% |
Fijians | 2.5 /100 | #240 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Panama | 2.5 /100 | #241 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 2.4 /100 | #242 | Tragic 5.8% |
Somalis | 2.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 5.8% |
Chickasaw | 2.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 2.1 /100 | #245 | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 1.8 /100 | #246 | Tragic 5.8% |
Iraqis | 1.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 5.9% |
Cree | 1.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 5.9% |
Tsimshian | 1.1 /100 | #249 | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.1 /100 | #250 | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 1.0 /100 | #251 | Tragic 5.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 0.7 /100 | #252 | Tragic 6.0% |
Africans | 0.7 /100 | #253 | Tragic 6.0% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 0.7 /100 | #254 | Tragic 6.0% |
Comanche | 0.7 /100 | #255 | Tragic 6.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.5 /100 | #256 | Tragic 6.0% |