Turkish vs Panamanian Married-Couple Family Poverty
COMPARE
Turkish
Panamanian
Married-Couple Family Poverty
Married-Couple Family Poverty Comparison
Turks
Panamanians
4.3%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE FAMILY POVERTY
9.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
221st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Panamanian Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,078,353 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 4.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 279,759,434 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Panamanians and poverty level among married-couple families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.073 and weighted average of 5.6%, a difference of 29.0%.
Married-Couple Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Panamanian |
| Minimum | 0.78% | 0.96% |
| Maximum | 16.2% | 21.5% |
| Range | 15.5% | 20.5% |
| Mean | 4.6% | 6.3% |
| Median | 3.6% | 5.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.6% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.9% | 7.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.4% | 3.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.6% | 4.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.5% | 4.0% |
Similar Demographics by Married-Couple Family Poverty
Demographics Similar to Turks by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Australian (4.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Burmese (4.3%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Lithuania (4.3%, a difference of 0.11%), Russian (4.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (4.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Scottish | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Swiss | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Serbians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| British | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Australians | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Turks | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Russians | 99.7 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Welsh | 99.7 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Austrians | 99.7 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| French | 99.7 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.7 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Panamanians by Married-Couple Family Poverty
In terms of married-couple family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Panamanians are Colombian (5.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Japanese (5.6%, a difference of 0.21%), Afghan (5.5%, a difference of 0.61%), Immigrants from Nigeria (5.5%, a difference of 0.63%), and Cajun (5.6%, a difference of 0.85%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-Couple Family Poverty |
| Iroquois | 13.1 /100 | #214 | Poor 5.5% |
| Armenians | 12.8 /100 | #215 | Poor 5.5% |
| Potawatomi | 12.4 /100 | #216 | Poor 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 11.3 /100 | #217 | Poor 5.5% |
| Afghans | 11.2 /100 | #218 | Poor 5.5% |
| Japanese | 9.8 /100 | #219 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Colombians | 9.2 /100 | #220 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Panamanians | 9.2 /100 | #221 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Cajuns | 6.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 6.7 /100 | #223 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Sudanese | 6.4 /100 | #224 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Cambodia | 6.1 /100 | #225 | Tragic 5.6% |
| South Americans | 5.7 /100 | #226 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 5.6 /100 | #227 | Tragic 5.6% |
| Arabs | 5.4 /100 | #228 | Tragic 5.7% |